Perennia Winter Webinar Series: From Cost to Confidence

Friday, January 9, 2026

Perennia is hosting the seventh year of the winter seminar series, Getting into the Weeds in 2026: From Cost to Confidence! Join us during six virtual sessions as we dive deeper into the conversation on farm business management and cost of production to support your business success! 


January 12, 2026 - 12:00PM - 1:00PM
The Benefits of Farm Business Management - Register for free here!

Heather Watson from Farm Management Canada will discuss the benefits of having good business management practices in place on farm. Farm Management Canada is a national organization dedicated to the development and delivery of leading-edge resources, information and tools to support farm business success. 

January 20, 2026 - 12:00PM - 1:00PM
Model for Provincial Cost of Production Development - Register for free here!

John leads the Business Analysis and Cost of Production Program for Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Agribusiness, developing provincial cost of production reports and enterprise budgets for various crops. John will discuss the process for developing these resources in Ontario.

Stay tuned for more sessions this winter.



Orchard Outlook Newsletter Vol. 25, No 15

Friday, December 19, 2025

Today's newsletter is the final issue for Volume 25 in the year 2025. In the last issue of the season I give a brief overview of the growing season in an annual report. The report is a summary of weather, tree health, crop load, pest pressures, and fruit quality that can be used for reference in the future. The drought this season is still fresh in everyone's mind and although it doesn't need to be reiterated, I do want to document it for our records. In this issue you'll also find irrigation resources and a list of upcoming conferences.



Table of Contents:


  • Degree Days
  • Precipitation
  • Tree Health
  • Crop Load
  • Review of Disease Pressure
  • Harvest and Fruit Quality
  • Orchard Rodent Control
  • Irrigation Learning Resources
  • WEBINAR January 12: Key Advances in Precision Crop Load Management
  • PERENNIA WORKSHOP January 13: Nitrogen Management Workshop Series - Focus on Amendments
  • Upcoming Conferences


2025 Growing Season Summary

  

Degree Days


The growing degree day models indicate that this past season the base 5°C plant development and base 10°C insect development degree days were similar to the 5-year average and warmer than the 10-year average (Figure 1). Recent growing seasons have been some of the warmest on record.

Even though temperatures were near to the 5-year average, Jeff Franklin emphasized throughout the season a lot of variability from the cycling of above- and below-average temperatures. The fluctuations caused extra risk and unpredictability from extreme temperatures. We experienced an extra 3 days with extreme heat in excess of 30°C, compared to the 25-year average.


Figure 1: Heating degree day accumulations for plant (above 5°C) and insect (above 10°C) development from March 1 to Oct 31 for the past 17 seasons. Provided by Jeff Franklin (AAFC).
  • Approximately 1% more plant development heat units compared to the 5-year average, and 4% more compared to the 10-year average.
  • Approximately the same plant development heat units compared to 2024, and 2% more compared with 2023.
  • Approximately 1% less insect development heat units compared to the 5-year average, and 3% more compared to the 10-year average.

Precipitation

In combination with the warm season and extreme heat events, the weather was exceptionally dry. By the end of September and October, the Canadian Drought Monitor categorized the Annapolis Valley as being under exceptional drought conditions, which is the highest index on the drought intensity scale. 

Table 1 shows the 25 driest years on record for Kentville. If we total the precipitation from April to October to represent the growing season, then the year 2025 is the 7th driest growing season on record. However, if we just look at the months of June to September during fruit growth, then the year 2025 was the driest fruit growing period on record. To further put this into perspective, we received 65% of seasonal precipitation (417 mm /646 mm) and 18% of fruit period precipitation (68 mm /374 mm). The extremeness of this event was unprecedented.

Table 1: The 25 driest years on record for the Kentville Research and Development Centre totalled from April to October (full season) and June to September (fruit growth). The current year 2025 is highlighted in yellow. Data provided by Jeff Franklin (AAFC).


Tree Health

The 2025 season is described as one of the most challenging growing years for the tree fruit industry in recent history due to the drought. The impact of the drought on tree health varied greatly between and within farms, depending on the water holding capacity of the soil and access to irrigation water. Sandy knolls running through orchard blocks created extra variability. Overall, no orchard was unaffected.

The drought caused tree stress and the impact was worsened by multi-day extreme heat events. Tree symptoms varied from curling leaves to wilting leaves, and in severe cases defoliation and tree collapse. Significant tree stress occurred in apples, pears, and stone fruit. 

The tree collapse and weakening is variable throughout orchard blocks, resulting in an uneven influence on orchard productivity and lifespan. Trees with a heavy crop load were more water stressed than trees with a light or no crop load. New and young orchard plantings suffered from limited growth and tree collapse. Mature fruit trees have deep root systems and were more resilient and suffered the least.

Successive years of extreme weather events (winter injury, flooding, hurricane damage) in recent history are compounding stressors that weaken trees. Trees that are severely weakened by the drought will be susceptible to environmental pressures for years to come. Stressed trees are expected to attract insect borers that can compound the issue by attacking and compromising the trunk.


Crop Load

Abnormally cold and cloudy conditions during bloom made pollination success questionable. One or two good days of pollination weather seemed to be enough to set a crop. But the resulting fruit set was variable depending on which flowers were open when and whether it was an early or late variety. Fruit set was more predictable where honeybees were used. Bringing in bees and having pollinator varieties nearby serves as insurance for pollination success.

Decisions for chemical thinning were challenging because of the uncertainty associated with pollination. Early decisions were to either thin as normal, to reduce rates, or to use Sevin alone. In general, reassessing later in the thinning window revealed the need for chemical thinning because fruit set was better than expected. Gala, in particular, was very difficult to thin. The opportunity for chemical thinning was short, and unexpectedly hot and overcast weather led to a carbohydrate stress and a sizeable fruit drop. The weather was conducive to thinning activity from the thinning products.

Late in the season during the worsening drought, crop loads were reduced more than usual to try to encourage fruit sizing. Many farms dedicated extra labour hours and expenses to drought mitigation by removing fruit and supplying water. The labour support was diverted from other farm tasks that were not tended.


Review of Disease Pressure


Apple Scab

Above-average temperatures in early spring led to early maturing ascospores and consistently drizzly wetting periods produced infection events that occurred frequently at intervals of one week or less. Of the spores that were released during infection events, a heavy amount were capable of causing infection. This season a total of 10 primary infection events were recorded, which is similar to what has occurred in recent years. However, this year's infections were particularly long-lasting and presented frequent and heavy risk of infection. The event on May 19 was notable because it released 44% of the total spore load.

Table 1: Summary of apple scab primary infection periods recorded in Kentville in 2025, based on the Modified Mills Table and assuming a green tip date of April 20.


Powdery Mildew

The summertime dry, warm and humid weather conditions were conducive to powdery mildew. Newly expanding leaves on terminal shoots were frequently at risk of infection in midsummer. Susceptible varieties like Cortland and Honeycrisp that were unprotected had plenty of infections on new leaf tissue. Buds are infected this year and will overwinter to cause infection pressure next year.

Fire Blight

The first blossoms in the Valley opened very rapidly around May 13-15 with early varieties in full bloom and later varieties at king bloom. Development was at a standstill during cold weather and then above-average heat pushed the end of bloom by around June 2. In general, infections were possible during the main bloom period on May 16 and May 29 with further infection risk periods on late flowering trees. Infections were variable due to variable rain patterns and in many situations wetting requirement might not have always been realized to cause infection. However, wetting events including rainfall and dew during high EIP periods were conducive to extensive bacterial infection, unless antibiotic protection was applied. New fire blight infections developed where protection was not achieved.

Harvest and Fruit Quality

Apple fruit maturity was a few days advanced or similar to historically early harvest dates. The recent trend has been for early harvest in conjunction with more growing degree days. Due to the drought, the average apple fruit size was small, leading to a lower total volume of saleable fruit and excluding fruit from the market that failed to meet market grade. Pears and stone fruit were also small. 

Colour development varied greatly within and between farms. In general, colour development was slower than last year. Where tree stress was prominent, colour failed to develop or orange/yellow tones developed on Honeycrisp. Without the diluting effect of water the soluble solids were much higher than usual.

Labour hours per bin were significantly higher than usual because 1) it takes longer to harvest small fruit, 2) marketable fruit were spatially distant, and 3) more decision-making was involved during picking to exclude undersized fruit. 


Resources


Orchard Rodent Control

Rodents feed on tree bark in the fall and winter when other food supplies are scarce. The most common issue is when rodent feeding girdles the trunk of young trees at or near the ground surface or at the height of snow accumulation.

Recommendations:

  • A weed-free strip exposes mice to predators.
  • Note that this year, apples in the alleyways may be attractive food sources.
  • Be aware that using straw mulch can harbour mice.
  • If rodent activity is observed (mouse tunnels, droppings and chewed apples), consider the use of rodenticide. Bait stations manage the risk of poisoning other species and the control is long-lasting.
  • Bait stations placed on the perimeter of the orchard target mice moving into the orchard from bordering fields, fence lines or ditches. Pay particular attention to orchard blocks that neighbour corn and soybean fields.
  • Install tree guards, if feasible, on young trees. Remove after snow melt in spring to avoid fungal problems at the base of the trunks.

Irrigation Learning Resources

Perennia hopes to continue to build local capacity with irrigation, and in the meantime check out these great resources.

A Perennia webinar from 2021 with Ted Van der Gulik, author of the BC Trickle Irrigation Manual:


Events


WEBINAR January 12: Key Advances in Precision Crop Load Management


Monday Jan. 12, 2026
12:00 pm- 4 pm Eastern Standard Time
 

All North American growers are warmly invited to participate in a PACMAN (Precision Apple Crop Load Management) webinar featuring renowned scientists. After more than five years of scientific research and ground-truth evaluations, the latest PACMAN results will be presented.

Don’t miss this chance to learn about cutting-edge technologies and strategies that can help improve crop load management and orchard efficiency.

Registration Link:
https://cornell.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_f_zjuqCWQp2nM47F2CiM3Q#/registration

Agenda:
12:00-12:10am: Introduction to USDA-SCRI-PACMAN project - Terence Robinson, CU
12:10-12:30am: Optimum bud and fruit number of HC and Gala - Terence Robinson, CU
12:30-12:50am: Economics of thinning HC and Gala - Mauricio Guerra, CU
12:50-1:30pm: Fruit Growth Rate Model results - Todd Einhorn, MSU; Tom Kon, NCS
1:30-1:50pm: WA-38 crop load management - Stefano Musacchi, WSU
1:50-2:10pm: Pollen Tube Growth Model improvements - Greg Peck, CU
2:10-2:30pm: Engineering Results - Long He, PSU
2:30-3:00pm: GPS and Variable Rate Spraying - Brian Lawrence, Yu Jiang, CU
3:00-3:20pm: Extending the results of PCLM - Jon Clements, UMass
3:20-3:40pm: Discussion
3:40-4:00pm: Future SCRI proposal to continue PCLM - Yu Jiang and Terence Robinson, CU

What Has PACMAN Delivered for apple growers? Over the past several years, the USDA-SCRI PACMAN (Precision Apple Crop Load Management) project has brought together scientists, extension educators, growers, and ag-technology partners to address one of the most challenging aspects of apple production: managing crop load precisely to achieve consistent yields, good fruit size, high quality, and strong return bloom.

PACMAN has advanced both the science and on-farm practice of crop load management and helped move apple production towards a more data-driven, season-long approach.



PERENNIA WORKSHOP January 13: Nitrogen Management Workshop Series - Focus on Amendments

In the new year, Perennia will introduce a new factsheet on managing nitrogen supply in mature, high-density apple orchards in Nova Scotia as a much-needed update to our existing nutrient guide. I'll keep you posted!

In the meantime, are you interested in learning more about the nutritional breakdown of on-farm resources (ex. compost, manure)? Are you ready to tackle nitrogen calculations to understand the nutrients supplied by manure and compost?

Through funding from the On-Farm Climate Action Fund, Perennia Specialists have come together to offer a four-hour workshop with presentations focusing on broader use of manure and compost as nitrogen sources, and then later break out into commodity-specific working groups to focus on the use of these nitrogen amendments in your specific crops. We will dive into calculations and nitrogen credits, using the NS Soil Labs results from soil and amendment analyses as our base point. These sessions will be the same focus and structure as the 2024 Nutrient Management Workshops, just hosted in different locations. 

Registration is required to secure your seat – spots are limited to maximize the impact of the break-out sessions. Please note that the tree fruit discussions are happening at only the event on January 13, 2026, 10:00 AM – 2:00 PM in Nova Scotia Community College Middleton – 295 Commercial St Middleton, NS.




Upcoming Conferences


Perennia Food and Agriculture Corp.
Edited by Michelle Cortens, Tree Fruit Specialist

Orchard Outlook: Drought FAQ Part 2 - Single Tree Replacements and Unharvested Fruit

Friday, November 7, 2025

I am posting a collection of frequently asked questions to help as you consider management decisions going into next season. There are many questions, and to keep the information digestible I’m breaking it into several parts. This article is Part 2 with answers to three questions. For Part 1, visit Part 1 Fall Weed Control and Fall Pruning.


Quicklinks:


I'm planning for tree replacement, so how do I know when a drought-affected tree is likely to die?

My theory is trees defoliated early in August/September from drought stress are at high risk of dieback next year. The defoliated trees were the most affected by the lack of water such that they shed their leaves to conserve what water was left. If some of these trees reached a critical water status, air bubbles could have broken the continuous chain of water molecules known as the water column. Water can no longer flow from the root to beyond the broken water column, and plant tissue above the breakpoint is expected to die. The outcome may vary from branch failure and treetop failure to tree collapse.

We can speculate, but we will only know for sure which trees are dead by next year at bud break to bloom. Trees can often survive on their final reserves until they kick into production to supply new shoot growth. For now, document your worst affected areas on a map to help with future interpretation. Good work mapping and being proactive about estimating replacement trees.

If you’re planning for tree replacement in a new planting or young block, consider that even if severely affected trees survive, they are weakened and could have long term health issues. If you have the opportunity and finances to replace the questionable trees early in the orchard life, then it will be best in the long run for achieving early, max yields. Replacing trees later in the orchard life has less impact, as I discuss in the next answer.

References:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00271-025-01017-w


Does it always make sense to replant individual trees?

No, it does not always make sense to replant individual trees. I know it looks better to fill in the gaps, but it might not always be fruitful. Single tree replacements have the best chance of success the earlier in the orchard lifetime they are replaced. As the orchard ages and the canopy fills in - causing shade - the single tree replacements can struggle to succeed.

Have you ever replaced a tree in an orchard only to find that it didn’t reach full production size? I think everyone has. That’s because in highly shaded situations, it doesn’t matter how much you care for a tree, it is horticulturally impossible to grow that tree. High density systems have a lot of internal shading from within and between tree rows.

Consider the age of the orchard. A young orchard has gaps of sunlight exposure throughout the day and replanting might be a good option. An older orchard with tree canopy coverage that shades the orchard floor more than 75% at midday creates a low chance of success for single tree replacements. Another source suggests a low chance of success at even 60% shading. In an older orchard that has reached its maximum height, tree rows cast a shadow at the base of the neighbouring row for a portion of the day. A single tree replacement is short and would struggle to grow in the shadow being cast.

Then consider if it’s practical from a management perspective. For single tree replacements to succeed, the soil needs to be prepared, trees need to be hand fertilized, trained, and pruned, and fruit or flowers removed. If a residual herbicide like Alion, Chateau, or Authority was applied in recent years, then the soil should be replaced for the replanted tree. The investment in the single tree might be greater than the potential return on investment, depending on the situation.

More commonly known, the orchard lifespan also limits the feasibility of replants. General orchard decline means that old age or unproductive blocks have a limited lifespan. Single tree replacements wouldn’t become productive by the time the orchard is replaced anyway.

The best approach for shaded and older high-density orchard is to let existing trees grow to fill in single tree gaps. Modify pruning practices to let neighbouring trees take over the gap.

If you replant in a young non-bearing orchard, you should have a good opportunity for success. However, consider the following:
  • It is critical to watch the bloom time of newly planted trees in relation to fire blight risk.
  • Remove roots when removing the dead tree and excavate the area to loosen the soil.
  • Rebuild the soil berm so the tree is not planted in a sunken area where water pools.
It may be common to fill in the gaps, but let’s pause and consider whether it’s worth the expense of time and money. How much sunlight is available to the new tree? If we look at the shadow cast by the canopy, it should be no more than 60-75% ground coverage at midday. Young orchard is the most promising candidate for single tree replacements. Don’t over-invest time and resources where returns are not expected.

References:
https://www.sacvalleyorchards.com/walnuts/orchard-development/replanting-individual-trees/
https://www.sacvalleyorchards.com/walnuts/cost-and-expense-considerations/replanting/



Is there any effect on tree health by leaving unharvested fruit on trees to overwinter?

I’m coming up short on answers to this question. I’ve reached out to contacts from other regions and so far there is no strong experience with this question. Some of the leftover fruit will fall off in the wind or rot and fall off. However, varieties like Gala have a tough stem and will not fall off easily. Locally some growers have made it a priority to remove fruit and others have not had the resources to do so.

There have been local reports that unharvested fruit can discourage return bloom the following year. However, I wonder if past experiences were related to heavy crop loads that didn’t meet market grade and went unharvested. The reported effect on return bloom might have been a direct result of a heavy crop load that contributed to biennial bearing, rather than an influence of unharvested fruit. I can’t confirm one way or the other.

One research study from New Zealand concluded that removing fruit during harvest induced changes in the tree by transporting more resources into storage organs including carbon, nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus. The study also found that photosynthesis declined slowly after harvest and then more rapidly after the first frost. Fruit harvest might encourage trees to store resources and prepare for winter but ultimately dormancy is triggered by frost and decreasing light and temperature. I would hazard a guess that if fruit are unharvested by the first hard frost, then trees would proceed with dormancy regardless.

Given that we don’t know the influence of unharvested fruit, this year presents the opportunity to answer our questions by doing on-farm comparisons. You could do a few side-by-side comparisons by marking trees that you defruit now versus trees you do not defruit. Choose trees at a similar state of health in the same planting. Return to check the marked trees at bloom time if you question the return bloom of the block.

If leftover fruit are not removed by spring, then eventually the fruit could be a disease risk. The dead fruit tissue mummifies and is a site for the black rot fungus to live. When possible, workers could knock off this fruit during winter pruning. If you find an efficient method (Darwin string thinner? Hedger? Cider poles?), please let me know and we could spread the word. I would discourage shaking the trees too much as it could damage fragile root systems.

References:
https://www.ishs.org/ishs-article/557_62

Orchard Outlook: Drought FAQ Part 1 - Fall Weed Control and Fall Pruning

Thursday, October 30, 2025

I will post a series of frequently asked questions to help as you consider management decisions going into next season. There are many questions, and to keep the information digestible I’ll break it into several parts. This article is Part 1 with answers to three questions.

Quicklinks:


Are fall applied herbicides safe for tree health after season-long drought?

Yes, because when trees go fully dormant in late fall the risk of herbicide damage is low. Fall cleanup is a good strategy to start weed control for early next season.

The drought conditions affected the proportion of weed species in orchards this season. Typically, during drought there is less emergence of small-seeded weeds that germinate close to the soil surface. On the other hand, you might have noticed that deep rooted perennials were less affected. Now that autumn rains have arrived, there will be a late-season flush of germination of winter annual weeds and resumed growth of perennials.

Some herbicide labels warn, “crops that are stressed may be more sensitive to herbicide application”, and labels list drought as an example of a stressor. Stressed crops may be unable to cope with the impacts of herbicides if the chemistries are taken up by actively growing trees or while storing reserves for winter dormancy. Our trees are in a drought-influenced state so we should heed these warnings.

Allow trees to go fully dormant by late November to early December and then practice fall cleanup. By this time, leaves have fallen and will scatter or may be mowed so they generally don’t interfere with herbicide coverage. The dormant state of the trees is a real advantage because there is little risk of uptake and tree injury. Just keep in mind that weeds should be treated with post-emergent (burndown) herbicides while they are green and growing, prior to a hard frost. Post-emergent and residual herbicides may be used in a fall program.

Come spring, trees may experience lingering stress from the drought when they restart growth and we want to give them the best chance at success. Efforts to reduce tree stress could be helpful. A late fall weed control program can reduce stress by: 
  • Minimizing early season weed pressure that competes with trees for resources.
  • Reducing the need for post-emergent herbicides applied in spring when trees are actively growing and are therefore more susceptible to injury.


What is the influence of the drought on residual herbicide decisions?

In general, using herbicides in the fall is safe as explained above. But there is one additional consideration to keep in mind for the use of residual herbicides and that’s their persistence or carryover in extreme circumstances like drought.

Many herbicides are degraded by environmental factors like sunlight, and microbial processes, but some herbicides degrade largely by microbial processes. Drought conditions slow microbial processes so some residual herbicides might carryover longer than expected and may in some cases lead to crop injury if:

  •  Reapplying the same product (increasing total residues)
  • Replanting new orchard (exposing young trees to higher-than-expected residues)

The residual herbicides of greatest concern after a drought are those mainly broken down by microbes and known for long soil persistence. 
  • Herbicides with a moderate risk of soil persistence are Sencor and Prowl. I’m not aware of specific warnings in tree fruit.
  • Herbicides with a high risk of soil persistence are Authority and Chateau. Label warnings suggest taking care.

Product labels have a safety buffer built into them but given the drought conditions we should observe the additional safety recommendations described below.

Authority:

  •  Instead of waiting the usual 2 years for reapplication, you should wait 3 years since your previous application. The label states, “Sulfentrazone is persistent and will last in the soils (carryover) for one to two years. DO NOT APPLY AUTHORITY 480 HERBICIDE TO FIELDS PREVIOUSLY TREATED WITH ANY SULFENTRAZONE-CONTAINING PRODUCT IN CONSECUTIVE YEARS (24 MONTHS). In case of drought in any of those years, a subsequent application of AUTHORITY® 480 Herbicide should be further delayed by the equivalent number of years in which drought occurred.”
  • The label advises a 3-year replant interval under normal circumstances and extended an additional year to a 4-year replant interval after drought.
Chateau:
  •  The rotational or replanting restrictions on the Chateau label do not state apple specifically so apples are categorized under “all other crops not listed.” The rotational interval is 1 year. However, the label also says, “After periods of extended drought longer rotational intervals may be needed.”
Alion:
  • You are also familiar with the long persistence of Alion herbicide. The label advises to, “Allow at least 12 months between the last application of ALION Herbicide and replanting an orchard or vineyard with labeled tree or vine crops.” There is no specific mention of drought on the Alion label in terms of replanting, but waiting longer might be advised. 

The unexpected drought shows the benefit of avoiding residual herbicides when you plan on taking out orchard within the next 2-3 years for replanting.

There may be some carryover of these persistent residual herbicides but it is difficult to predict and can vary by circumstance. You could extend the length of time from your last application and replanting interval. Or if you are concerned, there is an option to perform your own bioassay.

A bioassay involves sampling soil and growing some test crops that are sensitive to herbicide residues. To learn how to do a bioassay, check out an article by OMAFRA that describes the process. Late October to mid-November is a good time to sample soil for the bioassay because soil temperatures are now low and have slowed microbial processes. Herbicide breakdown between now and planting time next spring is minimal and therefore soils now are representative of herbicide residues come spring.

I’m attending an intensive Weed Science Course on herbicide physiology and biochemistry this coming winter on Dec 8-12 in New Brunswick. Let me know if you have any specific questions that I should bring to the discussion.


Weed management references:
https://www.pioneer.com/us/agronomy/Why-Dry-Conditions-Increase-Risk-of-Herbicide-Carryover.html
https://ucanr.edu/blog/uc-weed-science-weed-control-management-ecology-and-minutia/article/effects-drought-conditions
https://www.ndsu.edu/agriculture/ag-hub/ag-topics/crop-production/diseases-pests-and-weeds/weeds/herbicide-concerns-after-drought
https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/fall_weed_control_in_established_fruit_crops



Fall pruning is risky, but is it riskier than normal this year due to the drought?

Yes, fall pruning is riskier than normal this year and it should be avoided as much as possible.

Drought stressed trees are less likely to achieve their normal level of winter cold hardiness. To respond to cold temperatures, plants use resources like carbohydrates as protection. This summer’s less productive photosynthesis suggests fewer root starch concentrations were accumulated as reserves going into winter. Water balance as affected by the drought might also challenge winter hardiness.

Pruning trees in the fall or early winter would compound the problem by reducing tree hardiness even further. Pruning in relation to winter injury is a challenging topic to research because the weather is unpredictable for setting up a controlled field trial and the circumstances of each cold event are variable. But observational reports after extreme cold events suggest that all pruning practices reduce tree hardiness. The pruning practices stimulate growth hormones and interrupt the dormancy process.

Apples are typically hardy to midwinter temperatures as cold as -31°C to -35°C. Depending on the winter, losing a couple of degrees of hardiness through pruning is usually not a concern - although it is risky. But consider that the combination of drought stress and pruning would reduce hardiness even further to the point of damaging temperatures being possible. If cold temperatures were to threaten, then the decision to prune in the fall could be the difference between a live and dead tree.

In recent years we’ve seen the riskiest times for cold temperatures are in late January and early February. Pruning should be delayed until after the highest risk period has passed to keep trees as cold hardy as possible.

If some pruning must be done earlier in the winter for labour reasons, keep the following in mind:
  • Only prune trees in old plantings that are soon due for replacement and that you can afford to lose. 
  • Pruning in November and December is riskier than waiting until at least January.
  • Prune lightly by making limited cuts and remove less wood than usual. (There is no guidance on the merits of few big cuts versus many small cuts. Big cuts would remove many resources whereas many small cuts may cause a widespread stimulation of growth hormones.)
  • Delay pruning trees that showed premature defoliation due to drought.
  • If you are pruning and then a cold snap is predicted, stop pruning immediately.
  • Prune the young trees as late as possible, before bloom.

Then come questions about how to deal with trees that need pruning come spring. Keep the following in mind to make a plan:
  • Less girth and extension shoot growth occurred during the 2025 season so there may be less that is critical to prune off.
  • During the ideal pruning time in spring, prioritize high value trees and then return to low value areas. 
  • Prior to bud break and bloom, ensure youngest blocks are pruned first so growth is directed into desirable leader and terminal extension. 
  • If you’re pruning near bloom time and a frost is predicted, stop pruning and wait for the cold weather to pass to conserve fruit bud health.
  • On severely drought stressed trees, make only detailed pruning cuts for tree training and to expose fruiting wood. Wood contains usable carbohydrates and nitrogen so discarding the resources reduces growth potential. (Limiting pruning might be controversial and has pros and cons. Ultimately, if slight changes to pruning decisions is enough to impact tree health, then trees are not likely in a healthy state anyway).
  • It might not be possible to prune all blocks. After bloom, making large pruning cuts can weaken trees. If the orchard is near the end of its life, then there is not as much concern about weakening trees.
  • In unpruned situations, use growth suppression strategies like prohexadione calcium (Apogee and Kudos), root pruning, and summer pruning if needed.
  • Neglected trees can be renovated over 2-3 years. Begin with large corrective cuts and limit detailed pruning. Reestablish the height and shape of the tree. Do not remove more than one third of the tree area in one year.
  • I’m sure the pruning discussion will continue this winter and I'm open to hearing all thoughts.

A tree without maintenance pruning can be renovated but a dead tree can’t be revived. Therefore, let’s be proactive by avoiding early pruning and allow trees as much cold temperature hardiness as possible. Thankfully we have a good buffer between cold temperatures apple trees can withstand and cold temperatures we normally observe.


Pruning and winter hardiness references:
https://extension.psu.edu/tree-fruit-cold-hardiness-pruning-effects
https://creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/orchard-outlook/episodes/E2-S3--The-Coolest-Chat-about-Early-Dormant-Pruning-Guest-Dr--Richard-Marini-e1bmv55
https://open.library.ubc.ca/soa/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0106295
https://annforsci.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s13595-021-01052-5
https://www.ishs.org/ishs-article/903_166

Blog Archive